Which of the following cases did not extend the liability of auditors in regard to the concept of proximity?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Caparo Industries v Dickman established a three-part test for duty of care, focusing on foreseeability, proximity, and whether it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty. It did not extend auditors' liability but rather restricted it by emphasizing the need for a direct relationship between the plaintiff and defendant for a duty of care to exist.

Which of the Following Cases Did Not Extend the Liability