Two statements are listed in which p, q, and r represent propositions. Are the two statements logically equivalent?
-p or q; not [(not p)and (not q)]

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Both statements are logically equivalent because they both represent the logical operation of OR (p ∨ q). The second statement, not [(not p) and (not q)], simplifies to p or q using De Morgan's laws, making them equivalent.

Two Statements Are Listed in Which P, Q, and R