Participants in Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments found themselves caught between two norms: "obey legitimate authorities" and "do not inflict needless harm." According to the text,why was it especially difficult for participants to abandon the "obey authority" norm in favor of the "do no harm" norm?
A) The experimenter was in the same room and was a more salient normative stimulus than was the learner.
B) Participants were concerned they would lose the rewards they were promised for participating if they did not continue.
C) Task distractions and the fast pace made it difficult to decide that the "obey authority" norm was no longer appropriate.
D) Many participants had served in the military and had internalized the "obey authority" norm.
E) Participants were more concerned about how the experimenter would evaluate them than with how the learner would.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q142: When Jonathan Freedman and Scott Fraser (1966)approached
Q143: Mika Haritos-Fatouros (1988)conducted interviews with former torturers
Q144: In an alternative version of his original
Q145: Does providing individuals with information about social
Q146: In alternative versions of his original experiments,Stanley
Q148: In Milgram's "obedience to authority"study,people were asked
Q150: It is likely that participants in Stanley
Q152: In a conversation before class,you find that
Q198: How does conformity to normative social influence
Q205: What is the relation between idiosyncrasy credits
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents