Judy was up for a promotion at Swensen Consulting when her supervisor,Will,encouraged her to develop a sexual relationship with him.He suggested that her promotion would be a sure thing if they were involved.When Judy declined his advances,Will fired her.Which of the following would Judy most likely be able to prove in court if she decided to sue Swensen Consulting?
A) quid pro quo
B) disparate treatment
C) hostile environment created by co-workers
D) hostile environment created by non-employees

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Quid pro quo (something for something) is the most direct way to prove that rejecting a supervisor's advances adversely affected what the EEOC calls a "tangible employment action" such as hiring, firing, promotion, demotion, and/or work assignment. Quid pro quo would be the best option for Judy if she sues the firm for Will's actions.

Judy Was Up for a Promotion at Swensen Consulting When