The moral hazard issues in financial firms differ from those in non-financial firms in the sense that
A) the moral hazard costs in non-financial firms are borne ex ante by the private lenders as well as the borrowers; while in financial firms, the costs are incurred ex post.
B) the moral hazard is priced among the contracting parties in non-financial firms in equilibrium; while in financial firms, the costs are borne by the taxpayers.
C) the moral hazard costs in a financial firms are borne ex post by the private lenders, resulting in a loss of value; while in financial corporations, the costs are borne ex ante, and therefore get priced in equilibrium.
D) the moral hazard costs in non-financial firms are borne ex post by the borrower; while in financial firms, the costs are incurred only to the extent that a project fails.
E) all of the above
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Suppose that a demand deposit contract is
Q8: The reason why the deposit insurance has
Q9: A product-based instrument
A)entitles its buyer to purchase
Q10: Due to the sequential service constraint and
Q11: The reasons why private arrangements like
Q13: The debt contract feature of the demand
Q14: Which of the following factors is the
Q15: If a demand deposit contract can be
Q16: The sequential service constraint feature in a
Q17: A demand deposit contract does not have
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents