The U.S. Supreme Court developed the stop-and-frisk exception, whereby a police officer could pat down a suspicious person without a warrant, in the landmark case of
A) Mapp v. Ohio (1961) .
B) Terry v. Ohio (1968) .
C) Chimel v. California (1969) .
D) Miranda v. Arizona (1966) .
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: The U.S.Supreme Court established that criminal defendants
Q47: What is the purpose of allowing searches
Q49: Which is false concerning search warrants?
A)Police officers
Q51: Which is contained in the Fourth Amendment?
A)Right
Q53: Searches are not permissible if a police
Q61: Officer Castro notices a car in front
Q62: Which two decisions by the U.S. Supreme
Q63: The U.S. Supreme Court created the good
Q65: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that statements
Q80: Terry v.Ohio permitted officers the ability to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents