Al was an attorney in a small town and was very well-respected. A couple retained Al to represent them on the purchase of a home. Before closing, Al informed the couple of payments that they were required to make by check at the closing. Among the required payments the attorney told the couple to make were a check for $500 to Bob Brown and a check for $610 to Susan Lee. The attorney explained that the check to Brown was for a survey of the property and the check to Lee was for termite control work that the couple had authorized.
The checks were issued and taken by Al who promised to deliver them. Al did not, however, deliver them. Instead, Al forged the endorsements of the respective payees and cashed the checks. When Al was later arrested on a similar matter, the couple learned what had happened.
The couple made a claim against its bank for reimbursement, claiming the bank was not authorized to pay these checks because they had not been effectively negotiated to the bank. When the facts came to light, no person named Bob Brown had done a survey on the property, but the termite work had been done by Lee. Decide both cases.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q21: When the indorser merely signs a negotiable
Q40: Negotiation of order paper requires:
A) delivery only.
B)
Q43: In the case of a check, when
Q46: If a negotiable order instrument is transferred
Q46: A transferor may be able to set
Q47: Coppersmith executed and delivered negotiable notes to
Q49: Sue is an employee at an ABC
Q51: The implied warranties of an unqualified indorser
Q51: The situation in which an individual impersonates
Q54: An unqualified indorser who receives consideration for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents