Suzy Bartles enters into an oral contract to purchase a tract of land from Bill Hermes. The land is considered worthless, but Bartles feels that she has discovered a possible usage that would drastically increase the value of the land. To assure herself of the potential value of the land, Bartles orally hires an attorney to investigate the title and records associated with the land in question. Before gaining any information from her attorney, Bartles orally contracts with a builder to construct a huge building on the site. Because of the size of the project, a completion time is difficult to predict. Bartles now discovers that the land is indeed useless, a fact that she obtains through information from her attorney.
Bartles now refuses to honor her contracts with Hermes, her attorney, and the builder. Must Bartles honor her contractual agreements?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q42: The parol evidence rule:
A) applies to complete
Q43: Parol evidence may be admissible to:
A) contradict
Q46: A court may not imply a term:
A)
Q54: The parol evidence rule does not prohibit
Q55: A contract is created by which the
Q56: Parol evidence generally is admissible to explain:
A)
Q56: A contract is interpreted to give effect
Q57: Jones and Clark entered into a written
Q58: Bart was a self-made millionaire who had
Q59: Franklin, a hobby-shop supplier, and Gordon, a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents