
In CASE 6.1Free Enterprise Fund v.Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(2010) before the U.S.Supreme Court,the plaintiffs brought various constitutional challenges involving the appointment and standards for removal of members of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.How did the Court rule and why?
A) That limitations on the removal of Board members contravened the Constitution's separation of powers and that the unconstitutional provisions were not severable from the remainder of the statute.
B) That limitations on the removal of Board members contravened the Constitution's separation of powers but that the unconstitutional provisions were severable from the remainder of the statute.
C) That limitations on the removal of Board members were constitutional.
D) That limitations on the removal of Board members were constitutional only so long as the executive branch failed to challenge the restrictions placed on the president.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: What are the four primary ways in
Q22: Which of the following would a comment
Q26: Under the arbitrary and capricious standard,if the
Q29: Rules adopted by a federal agency are
Q31: Which of the following presides over formal
Q33: The U.S.government has adopted _ to facilitate
Q41: Officials of the town of Sunnyville were
Q42: Critics of administrative agencies claim that they
Q43: When an administrative agency adopts a regulation,it
Q44: Fact Pattern 6-1
Bruce had a disagreement with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents