In TheInternational Union United Automobile,Aerospace & Agriculture Implement Workers of America,UAW

In theInternational Union United Automobile,Aerospace & Agriculture Implement Workers of America,UAW v.Johnson Controls,Inc.case referenced in the text,employer Johnson Controls had a 'fetal protection policy' that essentially barred women from working in unsafe working environments unless the employee could medically document herinability to bear children.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?

A) That the policy was a facially discriminatory policy forbidden under Title VII because it did not also apply to the reproductive capacity of male employees.
B) That the policy was a facially discriminatory policy forbidden under Title VII unless the employer had documented proof that the exposure would likely harm a developing fetus.
C) That the policy was allowable under Title VII unless the female employee had documented proof that the exposure would not likely harm a developing fetus.
D) That the policy was allowable under Title VII so long as the employer had a good faith belief that the exposure would harm a developing fetus.