
The United States v.Jones case discussed in the text,involved a question of a GPS tracking device placed on car that was tracked for over a month.The U.S.Supreme Court held that installing the device was:
A) a search incident to a lawful arrest, and did not require a search warrant.
B) analogous to a traffic stop in plain view, and therefore did not require a traffic stop.
C) "negligible" trespass on private property, which did not require a search warrant.
D) a trespass on private property, which required a search warrant.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Criminal law protects society principally by:
A) vindicating
Q24: _ prohibits the testimony of the witness
Q25: _ for arrest is defined as a
Q26: The defendant formally pleads guilty or not
Q27: Which of the following is NOT an
Q29: Where may U.S.federal criminal offenses be found?
A)
Q32: Which of the following is NOT true
Q37: The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
Q38: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act makes
Q39: Evidence found as the result of an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents