
In the Pakootas v.Teck Cominco Metals,Inc.case discussed in the text,plaintiffs sued the defendant Canadian corporation in a United States court,regarding an order under CERCLA pertaining to its contamination of water in Canada that reached the U.S.Was the Canadian corporation subject to the courts of the United States?
A) The court ruled that the defendant lacked the minimum contacts necessary to require it to submit to the jurisdiction of a U.S.court.
B) The court ruled that subject matter jurisdiction did not exist.
C) The court ruled that the defendant was subject to jurisdiction in the U.S.court.
D) The court ruled that the defendant lacked the minimum contacts necessary to require it to submit to the jurisdiction of a U.S.court and that subject matter jurisdiction did not exist.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: State environmental laws may not be more
Q13: The Clean Water Act is inapplicable to
Q18: The so-called "Tailpipe Rule" enacted by the
Q20: The BP oil spill in the Gulf
Q21: Which of the following is NOT true
Q22: When can a corporate officer be held
Q23: What does the Superfund Recycling Equity Act
Q24: Canada withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol.
Q26: Most environmental laws are administered by the:
A)
Q30: Which of the following authorizes the federal
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents