
In CASE 18.2 Kelo v.City of New London (2005) ,the U.S.Supreme Court held that the "takings clause" of the U.S.Constitution's __________ Amendment now means __________ and a city can force private citizens to sell their houses and other property to a __________.
A) First, a regulatory taking, private entity
B) Fifth, public use, public entity only
C) Fifth, economic development, private party
D) Fifth, a regulatory scheme, private party
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: A _ gives a person the right
Q41: Until a developer obtains a(n)_ right,meaning a
Q42: Which of the following is not true
Q42: In relation to notice in connection with
Q44: Fact Pattern 18-1
Prudence wants to develop a
Q44: A _ sets forth the general terms
Q45: Susie has a great farm bordering on
Q47: What is generally meant by a reference
Q48: CASE 18.1 Eaton v.Federal National Mortgage Association
Q49: Fact Pattern 18-1
Prudence wants to develop a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents