
In CASE 19.1 Gatz Properties,LLC v.Auriga Capital Corporation (2012) ,Gatz Properties was the managing member of Peconic Bay,LLC,controlled by the Gatz family.After failing to dislose material offers for assets of the LLC,Gatz bought out the minority members' interests in Gatz Properties LLC for $20,89.The minority members sued,winning over $800,000 based on Gatz's breach of fiduciary duties.Gatz appealed.How did the court rule on appeal on why?
A) Affirmed, Gatz had breached its fiduciary duties to the minority members of Gatz Properties, LLC.
B) Affirmed, Gatz had breached its lease with Peconic Bay LLC.
C) Reversed,Gatz had breached its fiduciary duties to the minority members of Gatz Properties, LLC.
D) Reversed, Gatz had breached its lease with Peconic Bay LLC.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Cumulative voting allows a greater control by
Q18: A corporation is a private entity that
Q18: Federal law governs the obligations,if any,that members
Q19: Partners owe each other a duty of
Q23: In the case ofEstate of Countryman v.Farmers
Q24: _ is the simplest and most prevalent
Q25: Which of the following is true regarding
Q26: In most jurisdictions,there is no quorum unless
Q31: A member of the board who also
Q34: _ refers to a method by which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents