
In the Air Products & Chemicals,Inc.v.Airgas,Inc.case discussed in the text,defendant's boardof directors allegedly breached its fiduciary duties to stockholders by refusing to redeem a poison pill in place and allow a hostile takeover to proceed.The court ruled that:
A) the board satisfied its fiduciary duties because as a matter of law directors may use poison pills to block hostile takeovers that would result in a change of management.
B) the board satisfied its fiduciary duties because the members acted reasonably in response to the belief, based on reasonable grounds, that the hostile takeover offer was inadequate and posed a legitimate threat if accepted.
C) the board failed to act reasonably because the members acted in their own self interest, not in the best interests of the shareholders, and that the board failed to properly seek expert opinion regarding the hostile takeover offer in relation to the value of the company.
D) the board failed to act reasonably because as a matter of law it could not leave the poison pill in place in the face of a hostile takeover bid.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: The Securities and Exchange Commission recognizes the
Q20: Termination fees are sometimes characterized as liquidated
Q21: Some jurisdictions permit the shareholders to amend
Q21: Which of the following are among the
Q22: Which of the following is considered an
Q23: In CASE 20.1Smith v.Van Gorkom (1985)discussed in
Q26: Which of the following is true regarding
Q27: The Omnicare,Inc.v.NCS Healthcare,Inc.casediscussed in the text,involved a
Q28: In theCarmody v.Toll Bros.,Inc.case discussed in the
Q33: The business judgment rule is applicable only
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents