
In CASE 23.1Tufankujian v.Rockland Trust Co.(2003) Tufankujian signed a contract to acquire a Toyota dealership for $1.4 million.Rockland agreed to lend Tufankujian $700,000 at 7.5% interest,with the remaining $700,000 to come from the SBA at a separate interest rate which was quoted by Rockland at 6.5% (but with no written guaranty) .Ultimately,the loan was not consummated and Tufankujian sued.How did the court rule?
A) The court dismissed Tufankujian's claims.
B) The court heldTufankujianbreached his duty of good faith and fair dealing and awarded damages toRockland.
C) The court heldRockland had committed fraud but only awarded Tufankujian nominal damages of $1.
D) The court heldRockland breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing and awarded damages toTufankujian.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: A number of states have enacted legislation
Q23: A provision in a loan agreement that
Q23: A _ interest rate fluctuates throughout the
Q24: Which of the following is NOT true
Q25: In a(n)_ loan,more than one lender enters
Q30: Which of the following makes a security
Q31: Requirements that must be met under the
Q31: Congress is given the power to enact
Q32: A loan agreement may be preceded by
Q37: A(n)_ loan is one in which the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents