Doris and Dillon Davies were partners in the crystal jewellery making business, Crystal Balls.Doris was the more outgoing and active partner in the business and Dillon agreed to sell his share to her for $20 000.After the sale, Dillon discovered that Doris had not disclosed to him all of the assets of the business and that his share was in fact worth three times as much as the $20 000 they agreed upon.He threatened to sue her for a breach of her duty to him.Which of the following does not represent a basis on which he might bring a claim against her for breach of her fiduciary duty as a partner?
A) Doris has breached her duty of disclosure to him.
B) Doris has profited personally from her position within the partnership.
C) Doris has not accounted for the profits she has made from the transaction.
D) Doris has been guilty of misleading and deceptive conduct within the terms of the Australian Consumer Law.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: Partners do not have an implied authority
Q16: Each partner in a partnership is liable
Q17: Fred Fender, Dan Dunlop and David Harley
Q18: X and Y are partners.Z is a
Q19: In relation to torts and crimes, the
Q21: Which of the following duties is not
Q22: The feature that distinguishes a 'discretionary' trust
Q23: A trustee is the legal owner of
Q24: Which of the following would be known
Q25: Which of the following is not one
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents