A few years ago anti-trust proceedings (proceedings for uncompetitive conduct) were brought against Microsoft in the USA.The company was alleged to have abused its monopoly in the desktop operating systems market.The Court decided that:
A) there was ample and adequate scope for any potential competitor to develop a viable alternative to Windows
B) there was a 'barrier to entry' that made it prohibitively expensive for a potential competitor to develop into a viable alternative to Windows.
C) Microsoft had a healthy monopoly that delivered an effective and cost efficient product to consumers.
D) it was expensive but viable for potential competitors to develop an alternative to Windows and therefore the market was sufficiently competitive.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: What is a 'per se offence' under
Q5: The prohibition of misuse of market power
Q6: The role that was once performed by
Q7: There were three important changes to the
Q8: According to the ACCC, a misuse of
Q10: Which of the following types of secondary
Q11: Which of the following is not a
Q12: The difficulties of establishing the extent of
Q13: ASIC cannot authorise:
A)price fixing.
B)an agreement that lessens
Q14: Which of the following cannot be authorised
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents