Which of the following is not required to be proven to establish that conduct has infringed s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law?
A) That there has been conduct in trade or commerce on the part of the defendant.
B) That the defendant has done a positive act.
C) That the act was misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive.
D) That the conduct was in trade or commerce.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: Most of the rules regulating marketing and
Q16: Caveat emptor is a Latin maxim meaning:
A)let
Q17: Courts in the 17th and 18th century
Q18: The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
Q19: Section 18 of the Australian Consumer Law
Q21: Which of the following is most likely
Q22: Which of the following is most likely
Q23: A business that fails to comply with
Q24: The Australian Consumer Law Part 3.3 regulates
Q25: 'Unconscionable' for the purpose of ss 20
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents