Niko orders a steak in a restaurant.When the waiter returns, he regretfully informs Niko that there is no more steak.Instead, he offers Niko a lamb chop.Niko accepts as he is hungry and does not want to make a fuss.At the end of the meal, he refuses to pay the bill, claiming that the restaurant was in breach of its contract to serve him the steak that he ordered.Which is correct?
A) The restaurant is in breach of the statutory implied term relating to description.
B) The restaurant is in breach of an express term of the contract.
C) The restaurant is in breach both of an implied term as to description of goods and of an express term of the contract.
D) Niko accepted the restaurant's offer of a lamb chop instead of steak, and therefore has no legal remedy.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: Christian agrees to sell five hundred footballs
Q27: 'Rescission' is:
A)the cancellation of a contract and
Q28: Keith enters into a written contract to
Q29: In breach of her contract with Leaverpond
Q30: Which of the following statements is not
Q32: Benjamin is contracted to advertise exclusively for
Q33: Alexei verbally orders a birthday cake from
Q34: A 'condition' is:
A)a term of the contract
Q35: 'Liquidated damages' are:
A)damages awarded to a plaintiff
Q36: Damages awarded to a plaintiff in an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents