His Honour Dixon J observed in Ex parte McLean (1930) 43 CLR 472 at 483:
A) the mere fact of the coexistence of a Federal and State law concerning the same matter is enough to constitute inconsistency.
B) the intention of the legislature is irrelevant when resolving a dispute between coexistent laws of Federal and State parliaments.
C) even if a federal law is intended to be supplementary to a state law, there will still be inconsistency where the laws govern the same matter.
D) when a federal law declares its intention to exclusively govern a particular matter it is inconsistent for a law of a State to govern the same matter.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: The Australian Constitution places important limitations on
Q34: The Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth):
A)gives
Q35: The Australian Constitution lists a number of
Q36: Which of the following entities does not
Q37: Which of the following is not an
Q39: When exercising a reserve power, the Governor-General
Q40: According to the doctrine of responsible government:
A)persons
Q41: Executive power is the power to:
A)administer the
Q42: Which of the following statements is not
Q43: Which of the following circumstances would not
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents