In Menechino V

In Menechino v. Oswald, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that

A) the procedure of affording an opportunity for the offender to be heard and then telling him how he falls short of qualifying for parole is sufficient due process.
B) parolees do not have the right to due process in parole decisions.
C) counsel may talk for the prisoner during the hearing.
D) the state has to provide counsel to indigent parolees facing revocation.