Which of the following statements best describes the reason why social networking companies cannot be sued for defamation for user postings that appear on their sites?
A)The Communications Decency Act (CDA) uses a vague definition of indecency.
B)The Communications Decency Act (CDA) is not applicable to social networking sites.
C)Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) is not considered unconstitutional.
D)Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) does not provide immunity to an Internet service provider (ISP).

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) provides immunity to social networking companies for user postings that appear on their sites, as long as they are not the creators or publishers of the content. This provision has been upheld as constitutional by the courts, which means that social networking companies cannot be sued for defamation based on user-generated content. Choice A is incorrect because the CDA actually provides a specific definition of indecency. Choice B is incorrect because the CDA applies to social networking sites as well as other types of internet service providers. Choice D is incorrect because Section 230 does provide immunity to internet service providers, including social networking companies, in certain circumstances.

Which of the Following Statements Best Describes the Reason Why