Solved

TABLE 10-14 the Use of Preservatives by Food Processors Has Become a Become

Question 191

Multiple Choice
TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue.Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats.A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage.Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II,and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat.The results are summarized in the table below. -Referring to Table 10-14,state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II.

TABLE 10-14
The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue.Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats.A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage.Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II,and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat.The results are summarized in the table below.
TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue.Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats.A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage.Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II,and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat.The results are summarized in the table below. -Referring to Table 10-14,state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)
-Referring to Table 10-14,state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II.


A) TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue.Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats.A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage.Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II,and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat.The results are summarized in the table below. -Referring to Table 10-14,state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)
B) TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue.Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats.A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage.Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II,and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat.The results are summarized in the table below. -Referring to Table 10-14,state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)
C) TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue.Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats.A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage.Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II,and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat.The results are summarized in the table below. -Referring to Table 10-14,state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)
D) TABLE 10-14 The use of preservatives by food processors has become a controversial issue.Suppose two preservatives are extensively tested and determined safe for use in meats.A processor wants to compare the preservatives for their effects on retarding spoilage.Suppose 15 cuts of fresh meat are treated with preservative I and 15 are treated with preservative II,and the number of hours until spoilage begins is recorded for each of the 30 cuts of meat.The results are summarized in the table below. -Referring to Table 10-14,state the null and alternative hypotheses for testing if the population variances differ for preservatives I and II. A) B) C) D)

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q181: TABLE 10-15
The table below presents the summary

Q183: TABLE 10-15
The table below presents the summary

Q185: TABLE 10-15
The table below presents the summary

Q188: TABLE 10-13
The amount of time required to

Q190: TABLE 10-13
The amount of time required to

Q191: TABLE 10-13
The amount of time required to

Q193: TABLE 10-14
The use of preservatives by food

Q194: TABLE 10-14
The use of preservatives by food

Q195: TABLE 10-15
The table below presents the summary

Q197: TABLE 10-14
The use of preservatives by food

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents