The court in the case involvingthe ACT exam (Durrett)held that:
A)duress was clearly involved.
B)theclicking on terms for agreement online do not become part of the contract.
C)ACT's provisions were unconscionable.
D)it could not rule on the defense of the plaintiff being a minor.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court could not rule on the defense of the plaintiff being a minor because it was not within its jurisdiction. The other options were not relevant to the court's decision in this case.

The Court in the Case Involvingthe ACT Exam (Durrett)held That