Suppose a new public park is being built just across the street from a local church. As such, anyone who attends the park can clearly see the cross atop the church. Some parents believe the park's placement was intentional and have petitioned against it as a violation of the First Amendment. Do these parents have a legitimate case?
A) No, the cross is part of a separate establishment and is not endorsed in any way by the state.
B) No, the cross is not religiously symbolic enough to be considered an endorsement of Christianity.
C) Yes, it is clear the state is acting with disingenuous intent, and the park must be moved.
D) Yes, the park's proximity to the church is a clear endorsement of religion by the state.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: A judge who believes in an accommodationist
Q27: According to the Supreme Court's decision on
Q28: The idea that speech must present a
Q29: Speech cannot be deemed as libelous if
Q30: The clear and present danger test that
Q32: In a case regarding the polygamy practices
Q33: What is the significance of the Supreme
Q34: The printing of false statements with the
Q35: Which argument best justifies the use of
Q36: If the government were to declare Christianity
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents