When given a choice, it is always preferable to sue on the basis of strict liability rather than warranty because strict liability is easier to prove than breach of warranty.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Strict liability and breach of warranty serve different legal purposes and the choice between them depends on the specifics of the case, including the type of product, the nature of the defect, and the jurisdiction's laws. Strict liability does not require proving negligence, but proving a product was defective and caused harm can still be complex. Breach of warranty involves proving that a product did not meet the stated or implied assurance of quality or performance, which can sometimes be easier or more relevant depending on the case specifics.

When Given a Choice, It Is Always Preferable to Sue