Some courts have circumvented the physical harm requirement in those cases where the plaintiff can show he or she was in the "zone of danger."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Courts have sometimes allowed plaintiffs who were in the "zone of danger" but did not suffer physical harm to recover for emotional distress, thereby circumventing the traditional requirement for physical harm in negligence cases. This approach recognizes the impact of being in close proximity to danger, even if the plaintiff was not physically injured.

Some Courts Have Circumvented the Physical Harm Requirement in Those