Under the test, a defendant is liable if the plaintiff would not have been injured if it had not been for the defendant's negligence. This test is broader than the test, which is used to prove causation when concurrent causes combine to produce a single, indivisible harm.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q14: The theory allows medical malpractice plaintiffs to
Q15: The concepts of duty and actual cause
Q16: The substantial factor test is an alternative
Q17: An extension of the Cardozo rule is
Q18: Proximate cause reflects a judicial concern that
Q20: Under the rule, a defendant is liable
Q21: A defendant is not liable if the
Q22: The foreseeable negligence of others is not
Q23: Describe one exception to the Palsgraf general
Q24: Intervening causes relieve defendants of liability.
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents