Comparing two high-profile cases that used scientific jury selection, the "Harrisburg Seven" in Pennsylvania in 1972 and the O. J. Simpson trial in 1995, most people who know the cases would say that:
A) both cases demonstrate the importance of scientific jury selection.
B) both cases show a failure of scientific jury selection.
C) scientific jury selection failed in one case and triumphed in the other.
D) neither case is a good example of scientific jury selection.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Iris works as a trial consultant. When
Q2: Studies testing the effectiveness of judge's instructions
Q3: Voir dire allows attorneys:
A) to question the
Q5: The text mentions several broad personality tendencies
Q6: Venire refers to a(n):
A) group of inmates
Q7: In civil cases, the standard of proof
Q8: An attorney may use a peremptory challenge
Q9: According to the text, which one of
Q10: In Batson v. Kentucky (1986) and J.
Q11: A juror that scores high on measures
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents