In which of the following cases did the Court extend the Tarasoff requirement by deciding that information provided by a family member of an adult client and not by the client could trigger the "duty to protect" requirement?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Ewing v. Goldstein extended the Tarasoff duty by ruling that therapists have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient, even if the threat information comes from a family member rather than the patient directly.

In Which of the Following Cases Did the Court Extend