A researcher is comparing a new and less expensive treatment with an established treatment, in hopes of showing that there is no difference in outcome. The researcher does not perform a power analysis and, consequently, selects a sample size that is smaller than what would be recommended for an analysis of variance. The results show that there is a significant difference in outcome between the two treatments, and that the new treatment has poorer outcomes. What is the negative result of the researcher's decision to use a smaller sample?
A) The statistical conclusions reached are incorrect.
B) There is no negative result.
C) The study will have to be replicated, because its sample was small.
D) The researcher is guilty of misconduct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A researcher tests a new intervention for
Q2: A researcher tests a new intervention for
Q4: The researcher divides his lab rats into
Q5: A researcher conducts interventional research and uses
Q6: A researcher measures the dependent variable in
Q7: A group of 25 Labrador retrievers, and
Q8: A researcher is comparing a new and
Q9: A study using the factorial design measures
Q10: A researcher uses matching to constitute a
Q11: John Stuart Mill insisted that in order
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents