In the "Case Nugget," Ziva Jewelry Inc., v. Car Wash Headquarters Inc., the plaintiff left his car and keys with a car wash employee and a thief drove off with the car, abandoning it unharmed after stealing jewelry valued at over $800,000 from the car's trunk. What was the final holding of the court in this case?
A) That the car wash was liable to the plaintiff because the car wash accepted responsibility as a bailee.
B) That the car wash was not liable to the plaintiff because the car wash employees had no notice they were taking responsibility for the jewelry.
C) That the car wash and the plaintiff would be required to split the loss.
D) That the car wash was liable to the plaintiff for the loss because the car wash had not issued a valid disclaimer.
E) That it would be unconscionable to hold the car wash liable for the loss.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: Documents of title are governed by _,
Q51: In order to enforce a right to
Q52: A _ of personal property is a
Q53: In the "Case Nugget", Ziva Jeweler, Inc.
Q54: When property that is subject to a
Q56: Who does a bailment benefit?
A) The bailor
Q57: In a bailment situation, the person who
Q58: In the "Case Nugget" Ziva Jewelry, Inc.
Q59: Which of the following statements is true
Q60: The _ is the person who transfers
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents