Which of the following was the result in the Case Opener, the case in which the company was found to have generated waste with excessive concentrations of PCBs?
A) That the company had no liability because it had not intentionally generated the waste.
B) That the company had no liability because it was the responsibility of the federal government to clean up the waste.
C) That the company had no liability because it was the responsibility of the state government to clean up the waste.
D) That the company was liable because it failed to monitor in a manner that would have revealed the waste in a timely manner.
E) That the company was liable under federal law because it failed to clean up the hazardous area in a timely manner.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: Which of the following, if any, references
Q35: Regulations that aim to achieve the greatest
Q36: States that did not meet National Ambient
Q37: When a nuisance occurs, a party can
Q38: Once the administrator of the EPA establishes
Q40: Popular in Europe already, _ impose taxes
Q41: Which of the following regulates any chemicals
Q42: For which project would an EIS be
Q43: Blackstone Chemical spills polluted water into a
Q44: The federal law that protects the quality
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents