Is Seth's Statement True Concerning the Need for Psychological Counseling

Is Seth's statement true concerning the need for psychological counseling to prevail on a sexual harassment claim?

A) No, a plaintiff is not required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim.
B) Yes, a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on any sexual discrimination or sexual harassment claim.
C) Yes, a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim unless an independent witness can corroborate on an objective basis that sexual harassment actually occurred.
D) Yes, a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim unless the plaintiff can show that the harassment caused the plaintiff monetary harm in the form of lost wages because of inability to work.
E) Yes, a plaintiff is only excused from showing a tangible psychological injury in a claim involving sexual harassment if the plaintiff can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that severe and pervasive harassment frequently occurred.