[Big Spender] Ryan was a partner in ZYX law firm. He decided to withdraw from the partnership because he wanted to retire early in Costa Rica. The partnership agreement of ZYX law firm did not specify the objective or duration of the partnership. Although Ryan gave proper notice, the other partners claimed that he had no right to withdraw. Ryan was angry and decided to get even. Two days after he withdrew and before the partnership had provided notification to any suppliers of his departure, Ryan went to the office supply store at which he typically purchased supplies on account for the firm. He purchased several cameras, a computer, and other items, which he placed on the firm's account. Ryan just smiled when Joe, the manager at the store, told Ryan that he really appreciated the law firm's business. The next day Ryan headed for Costa Rica and cannot be located. Joe later requests that ZYX firm pay the bill for Ryan's purchases. The law firm, whose members had decided to continue the partnership after the dissolution resulting from Ryan's resignation, refused on the basis that Ryan had no authority to make the purchases. Joe says that he did not know that and that he expects to be paid immediately.
-ZYX law firm was what type of partnership?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A partnership at will is defined as a partnership without a fixed duration or specific objective, allowing any partner to leave at any time, as was the case with ZYX law firm since their agreement did not specify the objective or duration of the partnership.

[Big Spender] Ryan Was a Partner in ZYX Law Firm