In Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLP, the text case that discussed whether the plaintiffs were bound by representations of their attorney regarding settlement that they had not approved, which of the following was the result?
A) The agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not lead the opposing defense attorneys reasonably to believe that the plaintiffs' attorney had full and final authority to settle the litigation.
B) The agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not signed it.
C) The agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not given the attorney express authority to enter into the agreement.
D) The agreement would be enforced because the plaintiffs' attorney had express authority to enter into the agreement.
E) The agreement would be enforced because the plaintiffs' attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: The principal can sue the agent, and
Q15: An agency relationship may be created only
Q16: A principal may not enact a power
Q17: A gratuitous agent is one who acts
Q18: An individual who lacks contractual capacity may
Q20: Agents in Australia are obligated to act
Q21: _ relationships are the most common types
Q22: Which of the following is not one
Q23: Agency by implied authority cannot conflict with
Q24: Which of the following is true regarding
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents