Which of the following was the result in Fostveit v. Poplin the case in the text involving the right of a contractor who had built storage units to place a lien on the property in which "substantial performance" has occurred according to a contract?
A) The court found that a lien was able to be placed on a property because Fostveit had substantially performed his portion of the work assigned to him pursuant to the parties' contract.
B) The court found that a lien not allowed to be placed on the property because Fostveit had multiple violations of building codes.
C) The court found that a lien was allowed on the property, but only after Fostveit remedied the building code violations in compliance with local law.
D) The court found that a lien was not available because the Poplin's had improved the property pursuant to the contract and a lien would be inequitable.
E) The court found that a lien was available but the materials and time associated with the improvements the Poplin's had made would need to be deducted from the lien amount.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: The mortgagee can seek a deficiency judgment
Q18: Which of the following is false regarding
Q19: The term "super-priority liens" applies to both
Q20: Regardless of whether the artisan retains the
Q21: When a person hires a worker to
Q23: Which of the following was the result
Q24: Which of the following was the result
Q25: Kyla hires a contractor to remodel her
Q26: Which of the following is an example
Q27: Why is it important for a creditor
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents