Which of the Following Was the Result in Alcantar V

Which of the following was the result in Alcantar v. Sanchez, the case in the text involving whether the bank was responsible for conversion when it seized a joint account owned by a father and his sons to collect the debts on a writ of garnishment?

A) Absent clear and convincing evidence of a different intent, the ownership of the funds at issue in this case corresponded with net contributions according to the laws and the bank wrongfully converted the accounts.
B) The court ruled that absent good faith - the bank could not be responsible for conversion since it was acting on a writ of garnishment.
C) The court ruled that the accounts were not subject to garnishment because it would be against public policy to find as such.
D) The court ruled that the accounts were subject to garnishment because the accounts constituted debts due the defendant no matter who owned them.
E) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment based on public policy and that the son would have to bring an interpleader action to allocate the correct amount owed on the debt.