Is it likely that Ryan will be able to recover damages based upon a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability?
A) No, because the implied warranty of merchantability was that the car would, for example, be fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used. Pulling the boat was not an ordinary purpose for that small car.
B) Yes, because Ryan informed Kristin about the need for the car to pull the boat.
C) Yes, because Kristin told Ryan that the car would pull the boat.
D) No, because of the lack of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
E) No, because there was no warranty of merchantability.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q70: Lexi purchased a new printer for her
Q71: Which of the following is true regarding
Q72: When was the Magnuson-Moss Act passed?
A) 1950
B)
Q73: Assuming adoption of the UCC, which of
Q74: According to the Magnuson-Moss Act, when the
Q76: Any consumer good that is sold for
Q77: Yolanda ordered new business cards from her
Q78: Under the Magnuson-Moss Act, what is the
Q79: Is Ryan correct that the car was
Q80: Which of the following is NOT true
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents