Aranda claims that Rita's telephone call with Aranda is an admission of the existence of the contract and an admission constitutes an exception to the statute of frauds under the UCC. Is Aranda correct?
A) Yes, an admission is an exception to the statute of frauds under the UCC and Rita admitted the existence of the contract over the telephone.
B) Yes, an admission is an exception to the statute of frauds under the UCC but only when it is expressly worded as an admission to the other party.
C) No, even though an admission is an exception to the statute of frauds under the UCC, Rita never admitted the existence of a contract.
D) No, even though an admission is an exception to the statute of frauds under the UCC, the admission was not made in pleadings, testimony, or court.
E) No, an admission is not an exception to the statute of frauds.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

An admission can be an exception to the statute of frauds under the UCC, but it typically needs to be in a form that can be verified, such as in pleadings, testimony, or otherwise in court, not merely over a telephone call.

Aranda Claims That Rita's Telephone Call with Aranda Is an Admission