Which of the following was the result on appeal in the Case Opener involving the claim that Michael Jordan owed $5 million based on his agreement to pay the plaintiff's mother on the premise that he was the father, although it was later determined that the child was not his?
A) That the agreement to pay $5 million could only be rescinded based on a mutual mistake of fact.
B) That the agreement to pay $5 million could only be rescinded based on the mother's fraud.
C) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on either a mutual mistake of fact or based on the mother's fraud.
D) That the agreement to pay $5 million could not be rescinded because Jordan was aware of a question about his parentage.
E) That the agreement to pay $5 million could not be rescinded because Jordan waited too long in which to complain about the contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Intent to deceive may not be inferred
Q2: The active hiding of the truth about
Q3: Generally, neither the European courts nor the
Q4: Without legal assent a contract may be
Q6: Fraudulent misrepresentation is also referred to as
Q7: If both parties are mistaken about a
Q8: When the party making the statement would
Q9: If the parties have entered into a
Q10: Scienter is present when the party accused
Q11: Threatening physical harm or extortion to gain
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents