In the Case Opener, Apple Customers Tried to Disaffirm Purchases

In the Case Opener, Apple customers tried to disaffirm purchases of game currency by their children. What was the result?

A) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the parents were bound by the Terms of Service and notifications of their original contracts with Apple binding them to future purchases of game currency when their passwords were used.
B) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the parents were bound by the Terms of Service and notifications of their original contracts with Apple binding them to future purchases of game currency regardless of whether passwords were used.
C) The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that no contractual agreement was needed in order for the parents to be bound in regard to purchases of game currency so long as their passwords were used.
D) The court refused to dismiss the lawsuit because no case law was provided to prove that Apple's Terms of Service served as a contract for all subsequent transactions.
E) The court refused to dismiss the lawsuit because as a matter of law parents cannot be required to contractually agree to their children's future purchases that are unapproved by the parents.