Which statement applies in the dispute between Rose and Sal's Car Savings, considering that she waited to turn 18 before attempting to disaffirm the contract?
A) So long as, after reaching the age of majority, Rose did not state orally or in writing that she intended to be bound by the contract, then she did not commit an express ratification.
B) Rose was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it.
C) An implied ratification occurs when parents agree to accept the debt entered into by a minor.
D) If Rose caused any damage whatsoever to the car, she was said to have impliedly ratified the contract.
E) Rose was required to expressly ratify the contract before she could be bound to it so long as no damage was done; but if she did any damage to the car, as a matter of law, she is said to have impliedly ratified it.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rose did not commit an express ratification if she did not state orally or in writing that she intended to be bound by the contract after reaching the age of majority.

Which Statement Applies in the Dispute Between Rose and Sal's