Which of the following was the judge's ruling in Jamil Blackmon v. Allen Iverson, the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that the defendant, a professional athlete, wrongfully failed to pay him a percentage of proceeds received from using the nickname "The Answer" in merchandising although the defendant agreed to do so after the plaintiff suggested the use of the nickname?
A) That consideration was lacking because the defendant was not bound to use the nickname.
B) That the defendant's promise to pay was past consideration insufficient to create a binding contract.
C) That consideration was present and that the defendant was liable to the plaintiff.
D) That the issue of consideration was irrelevant because consideration was not required in this type of contract.
E) That the defendant was required to pay the plaintiff only half of the percentage initially offered because a gift situation was involved.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Promissory estoppel is an exception to the
Q12: A detriment to a promisor is a
Q13: Consideration is optional in every unilateral contract.
Q14: Which of the following was the result
Q15: Past consideration generally qualifies as consideration.
Q17: _ is what a person receives in
Q18: An illusory promise can constitute consideration in
Q19: Partial payment of a debt is never
Q20: The court will never look at adequacy
Q21: A store indicates to a produce seller,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents