Under strict product liability theory, which of the following would the courts consider a reasonably foreseeable party who may recover if an injury is sustained?
A) The buyer of the product only.
B) The buyer of the product and the buyer's family only.
C) The buyer of the product and any of the buyer's family and the buyer's guests only.
D) The buyer, the buyer's family, the buyer's guests, and foreseeable bystanders.
E) The court would have to rely on expert testimony before they could determine if a person is a reasonably foreseeable party.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Under strict product liability theory, courts recognize that not only the direct buyer but also the buyer's family, guests, and any foreseeable bystanders who might be injured by a defective product can be considered reasonably foreseeable parties who may recover if an injury is sustained. This broadens the scope of liability to include essentially anyone who could be expected to come into contact with the product in a manner that could lead to injury, reflecting the principle that manufacturers and sellers have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their products to all who might foreseeably be harmed.

Under Strict Product Liability Theory, Which of the Following Would