When would a defendant use the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?
A) To allow the judge and jury to infer that more likely than not, the defendant's negligence was the cause of the plaintiff's harm, even though no direct evidence of the defendant's lack of due care existed.
B) To allow the judge and jury to infer that more likely than not, the defendant's negligence was not the cause of the plaintiff's harm.
C) To allow the judge and jury to presume the plaintiff is guilty of contributory negligence.
D) To allow the judge and jury to presume the plaintiff destroyed evidence.
E) To allow the judge to hold the defendant liable under a strict liability theory.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: Under which of the following does the
Q54: Under which of the following does the
Q55: "Negligence per se" is a negligence doctrine
Q56: Which of the following is true regarding
Q57: Darryl is jaywalking in a jurisdiction that
Q59: Assuming res ipsa loquitur is established, what
Q60: Which of the following is a doctrine
Q61: [Diving Fiasco] Rogerio, who owns a dive
Q62: [Diving Fiasco] Rogerio, who owns a dive
Q63: Which of the following is true regarding
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents