Louisa decides to go on a zip line adventure. She signs a contract before she begins to go on the zip line, which says that she assumes the risks of accident or injury. While walking up the steps to grab the zip line, Louisa falls down due to a broken hand rail on the stairs. Could the property owner be held responsible?
A) No, because of Louisa's express assumption of the risk.
B) No, because of Louisa's implied assumption of the risk.
C) No, because Louisa fell on her own.
D) Yes, because a fall due to a faulty handrail was not the type of risk Louisa had assumed in the contract.
E) Yes, because she had not yet started zip lining but after she actually grabbed the line, the company would no longer be held responsible.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q59: Assuming res ipsa loquitur is established, what
Q60: Which of the following is a doctrine
Q61: [Diving Fiasco] Rogerio, who owns a dive
Q62: [Diving Fiasco] Rogerio, who owns a dive
Q63: Which of the following is true regarding
Q65: Breck and Brynn go to a new
Q66: Why do superseding causes allow defendants to
Q67: [Diving Fiasco] Rogerio, who owns a dive
Q68: Which of the following is an unforeseeable
Q69: What is the term for when a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents