What was the result in the case of U.S. v. Park, the case in which the defendant, the president of a national food-chain corporation, claimed he should not be held liable for allowing food in a warehouse to be exposed to rodent contamination because he had delegated responsibility to subordinates?
A) The court dismissed all claims against him because of insufficient proof that he had actively allowed contamination.
B) The court dismissed all claims against him because of insufficient proof of negligence.
C) The court refused to dismiss claims against him because the offense was a strict liability offense.
D) The court refused to dismiss claims against him because of insufficient proof of delegation.
E) The court refused to dismiss claims against him because of proof that he had responsibility and authority to prevent the contamination or to correct it and failed to do so.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court in U.S. v. Park held that the defendant, as the president of the corporation, had a responsibility and authority to prevent or correct the contamination issue and failed to do so, making him liable.

What Was the Result in the Case of U