Patty sued Raphael for hitting her car, alleging that Raphael was texting at the time when the accident happened. Patty did not present hard evidence of texting, such as phone records. The jury held Raphael was not liable for the accident because Patty had not proved Raphael was texting, and that in fact it was Patty who failed to yield to Raphael. Patty should:
A) Appeal and try to convince the appellate court that Raphael actually was texting.
B) Ask the judge to grant a default judgment because the jury was wrong.
C) Ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision because she made clear Raphael was texting.
D) Appeal to federal court to overturn the decision, which was made in state court.
E) Move on with her life, as she was unable to convince the jury to side with her on a question of fact.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Jill and Joe are in business and
Q26: Laws which enable the court to serve
Q27: For purposes of diversity-of-citizenship, where does a
Q28: For diversity-of-citizenship, which of the following is
Q29: Which of the following is a court's
Q31: Dr. Tanaka was served with a malpractice
Q32: Minimum contact requirements:
A) Are the same in
Q33: Which of the following do appellate courts
Q34: Which of the following would fall under
Q35: Matthew, who attends a local state college
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents